Sparse Reconstruction with Compressed Sensing: Difference between revisions

From Cornell University Computational Optimization Open Textbook - Optimization Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 171: Line 171:


* output <math>IHT(\mathbf{y}, \mathbf{\Phi}, \mathfrak{M}) </math>
* output <math>IHT(\mathbf{y}, \mathbf{\Phi}, \mathfrak{M}) </math>
* While halting criterion false do
* <math>x^{(n+1)} \leftarrow \P_{\mathfrak{M} \left[ x^{(n) + \Phi^* (\mathbf{y} - \mathbf{\Phi x}^{(n)})}\right]}</math>
* <math>n \leftarrow n + 1 </math>
end while
return: <math>IHT(\mathbf{y}, \mathbf{\Phi}, \mathfrak{M}) \leftarrow \mathbf{x}^{(n)}</math>





Revision as of 03:41, 28 November 2021

Author: Ngoc Ly (SysEn 5800 Fall 2021)


Introduction

often not really sparse but aproximently sparse

for is a Random Gaussian or Bernoulli matrix

are the observed y samples

noise vector k e k 2 ≤ η

s.t.

How can we reconstruct x from

The goal is to reconstruct x 0 ∈ R N given and

Sensing matrix must satisfy RIP i.e. Random Gaussian or Bernoulli ma-

traxies satsifies (cite)

let be an index set

enumerates the colums of and

is an underdetermined systems with infinite solutions. Why norm does

not work

What is compression is sunomunus with to the sparcity.

The problem formulation is to recover sparse data x 0 ∈ R N

The support of is

we say is sparse when

We are interested in the smallest , i.e.

Restricted isometry property (RIP) Introduced by Candes, Tao

Random Gausian and Bernoulli satsifies RIP

Let Φ ∈ R M × N satsify RIP, Let be an index set

Before we get into RIP lets talk about RIC

Resiricted Isometry Constant (RIC) is the smallest δ | s s.t. s ⊆ [ N ] that satsi-

fies the RIP condition

For is a restrciton on denoted by to k-sparse s.t. RIP is

satisified the s = | Γ | i.e. s ⊆ [ N ] and Φ | s ⊆ Φ where the columns of Φ | s is

indexed by i ∈ S

x i , i f i ∈ S

( x | S ) i =

0 otherwise

RIP defined as

( 1 − δ s )k x k 22 ≤ k Φx k 22 ≤ ( 1 + δ s )k x k 22

3 Lemmas Page 267 Blumensath Davies IHT for CS

Lemma 1(Blumensath, Davis 2009 Iterative hard thresholding for compressed

sensing), For all index sets Γ and all Φ for which RIP holds with s = | Γ | that is

s = supp ( x )

1k Φ Γ T k 2 ≤

q

1 + δ | Γ | k y k 2

( 1 − δ | Γ | )k x Γ k 22 ≤ k Φ Γ T Φ Γ x Γ k 22 ≤ ( 1 + δ | Γ | )k x Γ k 22

and

k( I − Φ Γ T Φ Γ )k 2 ≤ δ | Γ | k x Γ k 2

SupposeΓ ∩ Λ = ∅

k Φ Γ T Φ Λ ) x Λ k 2 ≤ δ s k x Λ k 2

Lemma 2 (Needell Tropp, Prop 3.5 in CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery

from incomplete and inaccurate √ samples)

If Φ satisfies RIP k Φx s k 2 ≤ 1 + δ s k x s k 2 , ∀ x s : k x s k 0 ≤ s, Then ∀ x

k Φx k 2 ≤

p

1 + δ s k x k 2 +

p

1 + δ s

k x k 1

sqrts

Lemma 3 (Needell Tropp, Prop 3.5 in CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery

from incomplete and inaccurate samples)

Let x s be the best s-term approximation to x. Let x r = x − x s Let

y = Φx + e = Φx s + Φx r + e = Φx s + ẽ

If Φ statisfies RIP for sparcity s, then the norm of error ẽ is bounded by

k ẽ k 2 ≤

p

1 + δ s k x − x s k 2 +

p

1 + δ s

k x − x s k 1

+ k e k 2

s

∀ x

Theory

Gel’fend n-width

Errors E ( S, Φ, D )

Definition Mutual Coherence

LetA ∈ R M × N , themutualcoherenceµ A isde f inedby :

µ A =

|h a i , a j i|

k a i kk a j k

i 6 = j

We want a small µ A because it will be close ot the normal matrix, which

will satisfie RIP

Algorithm IHT

  • Initalize
  • output
  • While halting criterion false do

end while return:


Numerical Example

Basis Persuit

Iterative Hard Thresholding IHT

Solver

2