Exponential transformation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The transformed function is presented as: | The transformed function is presented as: | ||
<math> f(u) = \sum_{k=1}^N c_k{{e}^{u_1}{a_1k}}{e}^{u_2}{a_2k}....{e}^{{u_n}{a_nk}} </math> | <math> f(u) = \sum_{k=1}^N c_k{{e}^{{u_1}{a_1k}}{e}^{{u_2}{a_2k}}....{e}^{{u_n}{a_nk}}} </math> | ||
Revision as of 14:32, 27 November 2021
Author: Daphne Duvivier (dld237), Daniela Gil (dsg254), Jacqueline Jackson (jkj49), Sinclaire Mills (sm2795), Vanessa Nobre (vmn28) Fall 2021
Introduction
Exponential transformations are simple algebraic transformation of monomial functions through a variable substitution with an exponential variable.
They used for convexification of geometric programming constraints (posynominal) nonconvex optimization problems.
Geometric Programming
Theory & Methodology
Exponential transformation begins with a posynominal noncovex function of the form [1] :
where and
A transformation of is applied reference https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1021708412776.pdf
The transformed function is presented as:
Proof
As presented in Theorem 1 and accompanying proof in Global optimization of signomial geometric programming using linear relaxation given that a function is being minimized it shows that after transformation all points on the transformed function are feasible in the original function and all objective values in the transformed function are the same or less than the original function. [2]
Numerical Example
Reformulating to exponents: Failed to parse (unknown function "\fract"): {\displaystyle {x_1^3}*{x_2^-4} + {x_1^2} + {x_2^(\fract{2}{3}}}}
Substituting
Applications
Exponential transformation can be used for convexification of any Geometric NLP or MINLP that meet the criteria of equation (1). This is done by turning the problem into a nonlinear convex optimization problem through exponential transformation.
Example of Convexification application
Proof of convexity with positive definite test of Hessian
https://www.princeton.edu/~chiangm/gp.pdf
pROOF THAT CHANGING IT DOESNT CHANGE THE BOUNDS OF THE PROBLEM https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1021708412776.pdf
Current Applications
Electrical Engineering Application: http://home.eng.iastate.edu/~cnchu/pubs/j08.pdf
Quadratic Geometric Programming
Ecconomics: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02591746.pdf
Conclusion
Exponential transformation is a useful method to convexify Geometric NLP/MINLP and obtain a global solution to the problem. However, this approach can only be applied given certain parameters are met. Geometric Programming transformation can be further explored through logarithmic transformation to address convexification.