Adadelta: Difference between revisions

From Cornell University Computational Optimization Open Textbook - Optimization Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Adding first portion of the page)
Line 2: Line 2:


Stewards: Nathan Preuss, Wei-Han Chen, Tianqi Xiao, Guoqing Hu
Stewards: Nathan Preuss, Wei-Han Chen, Tianqi Xiao, Guoqing Hu
== Introduction ==
Optimization algorithms (“optimizers”) are analogous, in a way, to engines in cars. Just as different engines are designed to suit various driving requirements—some prioritizing speed, others efficiency—different optimizers are tailored to solve distinct types of problems. In machine learning, optimization algorithms like '''Adadelta''' adjust learning rates during neural network training in a somewhat-uniquely dynamic manner, enabling efficient and stable convergence. Introduced by Matthew D. Zeiler, Adadelta was developed to address the limitations of earlier adaptive methods, particularly Adagrad's vanishing learning rates in prolonged training sessions [1]. This innovation made Adadelta especially valuable as a method that does not need to manually tune learning rates, and therefore “appears robust to noisy gradient information, different model architecture choices, various data modalities and selection of hyperparameters” [1].
Similar to how even similarly sized cars can come with a myriad of engine types, other optimization algorithms, such as RMSprop [2], Adam [3], and Nadam [4], exist as well. Each algorithm has unique characteristics and trade-offs, much like how different engines excel in specific environments. For instance, Adam combines the strengths of momentum and adaptive learning rates to provide a versatile option for training models [3]. The existence of multiple optimizers emphasizes their role as the "engines" powering machine learning, allowing models to tackle a wide array of challenges.
Historically, gradient-based optimization techniques evolved to tackle challenges in training models with large parameter spaces, such as vanishing gradients and instability in updates [5]. Adadelta marked a critical milestone by automating learning rate adjustments, eliminating the need for manual hyperparameter tuning, and maintaining computational efficiency [1]. Its principles influenced the development of other algorithms like RMSprop and Adam, further showcasing how optimizers evolve to address specific needs, namely, adaptability.
The study of Adadelta and related optimization algorithms is driven by the goal of improving machine learning model training—minimizing loss functions effectively, reducing training time, and achieving better generalization. By understanding Adadelta’s mechanism and its relationship to other optimizers, researchers and practitioners can make informed decisions when selecting tools for specific machine learning tasks, optimizing performance across diverse applications [5].
== Algorithm Discussion ==
== Numerical Example ==
== Application ==
== Conclusion ==

Revision as of 21:30, 14 December 2024

Author: Imran Shita-Bey (ias45), Dhruv Misra (dm668), Ifadhila Affia (ia284), Wenqu Zhang (wz473) (ChemE 6800 Fall 2024)

Stewards: Nathan Preuss, Wei-Han Chen, Tianqi Xiao, Guoqing Hu

Introduction

Optimization algorithms (“optimizers”) are analogous, in a way, to engines in cars. Just as different engines are designed to suit various driving requirements—some prioritizing speed, others efficiency—different optimizers are tailored to solve distinct types of problems. In machine learning, optimization algorithms like Adadelta adjust learning rates during neural network training in a somewhat-uniquely dynamic manner, enabling efficient and stable convergence. Introduced by Matthew D. Zeiler, Adadelta was developed to address the limitations of earlier adaptive methods, particularly Adagrad's vanishing learning rates in prolonged training sessions [1]. This innovation made Adadelta especially valuable as a method that does not need to manually tune learning rates, and therefore “appears robust to noisy gradient information, different model architecture choices, various data modalities and selection of hyperparameters” [1].

Similar to how even similarly sized cars can come with a myriad of engine types, other optimization algorithms, such as RMSprop [2], Adam [3], and Nadam [4], exist as well. Each algorithm has unique characteristics and trade-offs, much like how different engines excel in specific environments. For instance, Adam combines the strengths of momentum and adaptive learning rates to provide a versatile option for training models [3]. The existence of multiple optimizers emphasizes their role as the "engines" powering machine learning, allowing models to tackle a wide array of challenges.

Historically, gradient-based optimization techniques evolved to tackle challenges in training models with large parameter spaces, such as vanishing gradients and instability in updates [5]. Adadelta marked a critical milestone by automating learning rate adjustments, eliminating the need for manual hyperparameter tuning, and maintaining computational efficiency [1]. Its principles influenced the development of other algorithms like RMSprop and Adam, further showcasing how optimizers evolve to address specific needs, namely, adaptability.

The study of Adadelta and related optimization algorithms is driven by the goal of improving machine learning model training—minimizing loss functions effectively, reducing training time, and achieving better generalization. By understanding Adadelta’s mechanism and its relationship to other optimizers, researchers and practitioners can make informed decisions when selecting tools for specific machine learning tasks, optimizing performance across diverse applications [5].

Algorithm Discussion

Numerical Example

Application

Conclusion