Sparse Reconstruction with Compressed Sensing

From Cornell University Computational Optimization Open Textbook - Optimization Wiki
Revision as of 13:05, 28 November 2021 by Molokaicat (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Author: Ngoc Ly (SysEn 5800 Fall 2021)

Compressed Sensing (CS)

Compressed Sensing summary here

Introduction

often not really sparse but approximately sparse

for is a Random Gaussian or Bernoulli matrix

are the observed y samples

noise vector k e k 2 ≤ η

s.t.

How can we reconstruct x from

The goal is to reconstruct given and

Sensing matrix must satisfy RIP i.e. Random Gaussian or Bernoulli matrixies satisfies (cite)

let be an index set enumerates the columns of and is an under determined systems with infinite solutions. Why norm does not work

What is compression is synonymous with to the sparsity.

The problem formulation is to recover sparse data


The support of is we say is sparse when

We are interested in the smallest , i.e.


Before we get into RIP lets talk about RIC

Restricted Isometry Constant (RIC) is the smallest that satisfies the RIP condition introduced by Candes, Tao

Random Gaussian and Bernoulli satisfies RIP

RIP defined as

>

Let satisfy RIP, Let be an index set For is a restriction on denoted by to k-sparse s.t. RIP is satisfied the i.e. and where the columns of is indexed by

In search for a unique solution we have the following optimization problem. , which is an NP-Hard.

From Results of Candes, Romberg, Tao, and Donoho

If satisfies RIP and is sparse the has a unique solution. The equivalent convex program to the program.


x i , i f i ∈ S

( x | S ) i =

0 otherwise

RIP defined as

( 1 − δ s )k x k 22 ≤ k Φx k 22 ≤ ( 1 + δ s )k x k 22

3 Lemmas Page 267 Blumensath Davies IHT for CS

Lemma 1(Blumensath, Davis 2009 Iterative hard thresholding for compressed

sensing), For all index sets Γ and all Φ for which RIP holds with s = | Γ | that is

s = supp ( x )

1k Φ Γ T k 2 ≤

q

1 + δ | Γ | k y k 2

( 1 − δ | Γ | )k x Γ k 22 ≤ k Φ Γ T Φ Γ x Γ k 22 ≤ ( 1 + δ | Γ | )k x Γ k 22

and

k( I − Φ Γ T Φ Γ )k 2 ≤ δ | Γ | k x Γ k 2

SupposeΓ ∩ Λ = ∅

k Φ Γ T Φ Λ ) x Λ k 2 ≤ δ s k x Λ k 2

Lemma 2 (Needell Tropp, Prop 3.5 in CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery

from incomplete and inaccurate √ samples)

If Φ satisfies RIP k Φx s k 2 ≤ 1 + δ s k x s k 2 , ∀ x s : k x s k 0 ≤ s, Then ∀ x

k Φx k 2 ≤

p

1 + δ s k x k 2 +

p

1 + δ s

k x k 1

sqrts

Lemma 3 (Needell Tropp, Prop 3.5 in CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery

from incomplete and inaccurate samples)

Let x s be the best s-term approximation to x. Let x r = x − x s Let

y = Φx + e = Φx s + Φx r + e = Φx s + ẽ

If Φ satisfies RIP for sparsity s, then the norm of error ẽ is bounded by

k ẽ k 2 ≤

p

1 + δ s k x − x s k 2 +

p

1 + δ s

k x − x s k 1

+ k e k 2

s

∀ x

Theory

Gel’fand n-width

Errors E ( S, Φ, D )

Definition Mutual Coherence

Let , the mutual coherence is defined by:</math>


We want a small µ A because it will be close ot the normal matrix, which

Then

Define the threashholding operators as: selects the best-k term approximation for some k

will satisfies RIP

Stopping criterion is

Algorithm IHT

  • Initialize
  • output
  • Set
  • While halting criterion false do
    • end while
  • return:

Numerical Example

Iterative Hard Thresholding IHT


Check if satisfies RIP with mutual coherence.

Applications

Distributed Systems peer-to-peer network

Collaborative sensor networks for energy savings.

Distributed Systems where Energy needs to be preserved.

Conclusion

References

[1]


[2]

[3]

[4]


[5]


[6]


[7]

[8]

[9]

  1. 2. Emmanuel J. Candès and Terence Tao. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 51(12):4203–4215, 2005.
  2. 5. Stephen A. Vavasis. Elementary proof of the spherical section property for random matrices. Univer-sity of Waterloo, Waterloo,Technical report, 2009.
  3. 6. Angshul Majumdar. Compressed sensing for engineers. Devices, circuits, and systems. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2019. Includes bibliographical references and index.
  4. 7. Simon Foucart and Holger Rauhut. A mathematical introduction to compressive sens- ing. Applied and numerical harmonic analysis. Birkhäuser, New York [u.a.], 2013.
  5. 8. D. L. Donoho. Compressed sensing. 52:1289–1306, 2006.
  6. 12. E. J. Candes, J. Romberg, and T. Tao. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. 52:489–509, 2006.
  7. 16. Giulio Coluccia, Chiara Ravazzi, and Enrico Magli. Compressed sensing for dis- tributed systems, 2015.
  8. 17. Mohammed Rostami. Compressed sensing with side information on feasible re- gion, 2013.
  9. 18. Thomas Blumensath and Mike E. Davies. Iterative hard thresholding for com- pressed sensing. May 2008.