Exponential transformation: Difference between revisions

From Cornell University Computational Optimization Open Textbook - Optimization Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
Substituting <math> x_1 = e^{u_1}, x_2 = e^{u_2} </math>
Substituting <math> x_1 = e^{u_1}, x_2 = e^{u_2} </math>


<math> {e^{u_1*3}}*{e^{{u_2}*{-4}}} + {e^{u_2*2} + {e^{{u_2}*{\frac{2}{3}}} \leq 4 </math>
<math> {e^{{u_1}*{3}}}*{e^{{u_2}*{-4}}} + {e^{{u_2}*{2}}} + {e^{{u_2}*{\frac{2}{3}}} \leq 4 </math>


<math> </math>
<math> </math>
Line 37: Line 37:
<math> </math>
<math> </math>


Linearization  
Linearization example





Revision as of 16:09, 27 November 2021

Author: Daphne Duvivier (dld237), Daniela Gil (dsg254), Jacqueline Jackson (jkj49), Sinclaire Mills (sm2795), Vanessa Nobre (vmn28) Fall 2021


Introduction

Exponential transformations are simple algebraic transformation of monomial functions through a variable substitution with an exponential variable. They are used for convexification of geometric programming constraints (posynominal) nonconvex optimization problems. This transformation creates a convex function without changing the decision space of the problem [1]and reducing the time to solve an NLP/MINLP, in some cases linearization can be achieved through exponential transformation as seen in the example below.

Theory & Methodology

Exponential transformation begins with a posynominal (Positive and Polynomial) noncovex function of the form [2] :

where and

A transformation of is applied [3]

The transformed function is presented as:


Numerical Example

Reformulating to exponents

Substituting

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle {e^{{u_1}*{3}}}*{e^{{u_2}*{-4}}} + {e^{{u_2}*{2}}} + {e^{{u_2}*{\frac{2}{3}}} \leq 4 }

Linearization example


Applications

Exponential transformation can be used for convexification of any Geometric NLP or MINLP that meet the criteria of equation (1). This is done by turning the problem into a nonlinear convex optimization problem through exponential transformation.


Additionally as presented in Theorem 1 and accompanying proof in "Global optimization of signomial geometric programming using linear relaxation" by P. Shen, K. Zhang, given that a function is being minimized it shows that after transformation all points on the transformed function are feasible in the original function and all objective values in the transformed function are the same or less than the original function. [4]

Example of Convexification application in MINLP

Proof of convexity with positive definite test of Hessian


https://www.princeton.edu/~chiangm/gp.pdf

pROOF THAT CHANGING IT DOESNT CHANGE THE BOUNDS OF THE PROBLEM https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1021708412776.pdf

Current Applications

Electrical Engineering Application: http://home.eng.iastate.edu/~cnchu/pubs/j08.pdf


Quadratic Geometric Programming Ecconomics: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02591746.pdf

Conclusion

Exponential transformation is a useful method to convexify Geometric NLP/MINLP and obtain a global solution to the problem. However, this approach can only be applied given certain parameters are met. Geometric Programming transformation can be further explored through logarithmic transformation to address convexification.

References

  1. Li, D., Biswal, M.P. Exponential Transformation in Convexifying a Noninferior Frontier and Exponential Generating Method. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 99, 183–199 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021708412776
  2. Boyd, S., Kim, SJ., Vandenberghe, L. et al. A tutorial on geometric programming. Optim Eng 8, 67 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-007-9001-7
  3. Grossmann, I.E. Review of Nonlinear Mixed-Integer and Disjunctive Programming Techniques. Optimization and Engineering 3, 227–252 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021039126272
  4. Boyd, S., Kim, SJ., Vandenberghe, L. et al. A tutorial on geometric programming. Optim Eng 8, 67 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-007-9001-7