Geometric programming: Difference between revisions

From Cornell University Computational Optimization Open Textbook - Optimization Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:
'''Reformulate the following non-convex MINLP to a convex one'''
'''Reformulate the following non-convex MINLP to a convex one'''


'''Minimize''' <math>f_0(x_1,x_2,x_3) = 16(x_1)^2(x_2)^2 + 3(x_2)^3(x_3)^4 - \left ( \frac{16}{x_2} \right ) </math>
'''Minimize''' <math>f_0(x_1,x_2,x_3) = 16(x_1)^2(x_2)^2 + 3(x_2)^3(x_3)^4 </math>


'''Subject to:''' <math>x^5+2y^6+1\leqslant1 </math>,
'''Subject to:''' <math>x^5+2y^6+1\leqslant1 </math>,

Revision as of 16:04, 13 November 2021

Authors: Wenjun Zhu(wz274), Sam Olsen(sgo23) (SYSEN5800, FALL 2021)

Introduction

Theory/Methodology

Definition

The standard form of Geometric Programming optimization is to minimize the objective function which must be posynomial. The inequality constraints can only have the form of a posynomial less than or equal to one, and the equality constraints can only have the form of a monomial equal to one.

Standard Form

Minimize

Subject to: , = 1,...,m,

, = 1,...,p,

, = 1,...,q,

where are posynomial functions, are monomials, and are the optimization variables.



Numerical Examples

Solve a Geometric Programming problem in standard form

Minimize

Subject to: ,

,

,

,

For the problem above, this is a geometric optimization problem in standard form.

The solution is: ...

Transform Nonconvex Optimization Problems to Convex Optimization problem

Reformulate the following non-convex MINLP to a convex one

Minimize

Subject to: ,

,

,

,



Applications

Conclusion

References