Disjunctive inequalities: Difference between revisions
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
A good example of a problem that uses disjunctive inequalities is reformulating the following problem below into a MILP: | A good example of a problem that uses disjunctive inequalities is reformulating the following problem below into a MILP: | ||
<math> [X1 - x2 \leq - 1] V [-x1 + x2 \leq -1] | <math> [X1 - x2 \leq - 1] V [-x1 + x2 \leq -1] |
Revision as of 20:19, 28 November 2021
Authors: Derek Moore (drm323), Grant Logan (gsl59), Matthew Dinh (md992), Daniel Ladron (dl976)
Introduction
Disjunctive inequalities are a form of disjunctive constraints that can be applied to linear programming. Disjunctive constraints are applied in all disjunctive programming, which just refers to the use of logical constraints, which include the “Or” and “And” statements. In order to solve a disjunctive, the constraints have to be converted into multiple integer programming (MIP) constraints, which is called disjunction. Disjunction involves the implementation of a binary variable to create a new set of constraints that can be solved easily. Two common methods for disjunction are the Big-M Reformulation and the Convex-Hull Reformulation.
Method
General
When given a set of inequalities, such as , the disjunctive form is given by: . In order to turn the problem into a solvable MIP or MILP, logical constraints are created by using sufficiently large numbers, such as M1 and M2, and a binary variable y for each inequality. This is shown below by M1, M2, y1, and y1:
To set the binary variable to be mutually exclusive, the sum of the variables is set to 1 and the range is set to {0,1}.
Big-M Reformulation
For the Big-M reformulation, a sufficiently large number, M, is used to nullify one set of constraints. This is accomplished by adding or subtracting the term “M*(1-y)” to the upper bound and lower bound constraints, respectively, with its respective binary variable. For example, given a solution space (shown graphically in Figure 1), to determine which of the solutions is optimal, the problem must be formulated such that one set of constraints is chosen. Using the Big-M Reformulation, the following MILP set would be obtained:
y Formulation
-y Formulation
Convex-Hull Reformulation
Similar to the Big-M reformulation, the convex-hull reformulation uses a binary variable, y, to constrain the set of inequalities. The first step in converting the problem into a solvable MILP is breaking all variables into a set of variables, such as (x1 → x11 + x12). By adding these addition variables, it is possible to isolate what set of parameters provide for the optimal solution of the problem. Then, similar to the Big-M reformulation, a sufficiently large variable, M, is used to nullify the non-optimal variable set, such as x11 and x12. For the problem show in Figure 1, the following variable constraints would be formulated:
y Formulation
-y Formulation
Formulation of the numerical constraints would then be implemented: y Formulation
-y Formulation
With the Convex-Hull transformation, the additional constraints confine the problem, such that a tighter (convex) solution space is examined compared to Big-M Formulation.
Examples
A good example of a problem that uses disjunctive inequalities is reformulating the following problem below into a MILP:
<math> [X1 - x2 \leq - 1] V [-x1 + x2 \leq -1] 0 \leq x1 \leq 4, 0 \leq x2 \leq 4
Applications
Production method in order to maximize profits.
Conclusion
Disjunctive inequalities can be used to generate all valid inequalities for an integer program. A simple disjunctive procedure can be used to generate all valid inequalities for a 0 or 1 mixed integer program. It could be shown that to obtain the convex hull of a 0 or 1 mixed integer program, it suffices to take the convex hull of each 0 or 1 variable at a time. Another method to reformulate a disjunctive inequality is to implement the Big-M method which generates a much smaller MILP/MINLP with a tighter relaxation than the convex-hull method.
References
- ↑ L.A. Wolsey, Integer Programming, pp 130 - 133. Wiley, 1998.