2024 Cornell Optimization Open Textbook Feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SYSEN5800TAs (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
SYSEN5800TAs (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== [[Computational complexity]] == | == [[Computational complexity]] == | ||
*For the applications section, a better method is to briefly summarize the advantages of the method in multiple areas, instead of presents its application on two very specific cases. | |||
*Please try to update equations on page 5. | |||
*Please try to use the pseudocode for the procedure described on page 3. | |||
*m_k and p in eq.(1) are not defined. | |||
*Fix the typo “prediced reduction” in eq.(3). | |||
*Avoid using contraction (e.g., it’s, doesn’t) and pronouns (e.g., we, us) in scientific writing. | |||
*Rewrite the sentence, “Identical to line search, we do not need to compute the algorithm (2)” as (2) itself is not an algorithm. | |||
*The termination conditions are not complete in section “Termination Criteria”. | |||
*Fletcher is not the same author as cited in [5]. | |||
== [[Heuristic algorithms]] == | == [[Heuristic algorithms]] == | ||
Revision as of 13:53, 13 December 2024
Computational complexity
- For the applications section, a better method is to briefly summarize the advantages of the method in multiple areas, instead of presents its application on two very specific cases.
- Please try to update equations on page 5.
- Please try to use the pseudocode for the procedure described on page 3.
- m_k and p in eq.(1) are not defined.
- Fix the typo “prediced reduction” in eq.(3).
- Avoid using contraction (e.g., it’s, doesn’t) and pronouns (e.g., we, us) in scientific writing.
- Rewrite the sentence, “Identical to line search, we do not need to compute the algorithm (2)” as (2) itself is not an algorithm.
- The termination conditions are not complete in section “Termination Criteria”.
- Fletcher is not the same author as cited in [5].